Archer community members offer perspectives on final presidential debate
Photo credit: Nyah Fernandez
The second and final presidential debate occurred on Oct. 22 at Belmont University in Nashville, TN. “I think the final presidential debate was much calmer than the first with fewer interruptions which allowed for the American people to hear actual policy discussion from both Trump and Biden,” senior Mackenzie Turner said.
November 1, 2020
Democratic nominee Joe Biden and Republican nominee Donald Trump faced off for the final presidential debate of 2020 before the Nov. 3 election, covering issues such as the coronavirus, the environment and race relations. The debate took place on Thursday, Oct. 22 at Belmont University in Nashville, TN.
On the night of the debate, junior Lexi Tooley was initially excited to hear both candidate’s opinions on the chosen issues. As the debate progressed, Tooley said that her feelings shifted.
“I was shocked at some of the statements that Donald Trump made,” Tooley said. “Particularly ‘I’m the least racist president,’ and what he said about doing the most for the black community. I was very surprised, to say the least.”
Norah Adler, an environmental and sustainability columnist for the Oracle, is pro-environmental legislation. She “wished” that there had been more discussion of the environment during the debate itself.
“I think [the environment] needs to be a bipartisan issue to get legislative change,” Adler said. “Legislative change needs to happen.”
Beth Gold is a history teacher and advisor to the new Artemis Center, a non-partisan political activism group that promotes service-learning. During the Artemis Center’s weekly practicum sessions, Gold engages her students in discussion their participation in the election, social injustice and the Supreme Court nomination.
“I think last night’s debate was much more controlled. Obviously, the mute button had a lot to do with making the conversation more civil a little bit more, back and forth, rather than at talking over each other at the same time,” Gold said. “There was a more civil tone, more controlled conversation”
An issue that was present in the debate surrounded the opening of schools amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. While comfort levels vary, there are a range of approaches being taken.
“I feel like teachers, nationally, their interests have not been taken into account enough. And we are not part of the teachers union are, thankfully, speaking out on behalf of teacher’s interests,” Gold said. “The public has a big interest in getting schools open. But all teachers are not comfortable with that situation, so I’m thankful that I’m not having to make that decision for myself as to what my comfort level would be.”
In terms of the Coronavirus, Tooley saw the differences of opinion between Biden’s and Trump’s action plans.
“With Coronavirus, they had a whole different process on how they would choose to fix this pandemic,” Tooley said. “But I feel like Trump’s policies are directed towards the 1% in white America, while Biden is interested in the whole.”
According to Gold, the debates served as an outlet for students and people to engage in democracy.
“I feel like a silver lining of the past four years has been increased student engagement, student empowerment and student agency. That is always a good thing for people to feel like they can participate in our democracy,” Gold said. “[Students] have a role, they have a path. They have a vision for what they want the country to look like.”

Grace Doyle joined the Oracle as a staff reporter in 2019 and became the Sports Editor in 2020. She loves journalism and has attended the School of the...

Nyah Fernandez joined the Oracle as a staff reporter in 2019 and became the Multimedia Editor in 2020. She loves playing basketball and volleyball and...
As part of Archer’s active and engaged community, the Editorial Board welcomes reader comments and debate and encourages community members to take ownership of their opinions by using their names when commenting. However, in order to ensure a diverse range of opinions, the editorial board does allow anonymous comments on articles as long as the perspective cannot be obtained elsewhere, and they are respectful and relevant. Because we are a 6-12 school, the Editorial Board reserves the right to omit profanity. We do not publish comments that serve primarily as an advertisement or to promote a specific product. Comments are moderated and may be edited in accordance with the Oracle’s profanity policy, but the Editorial Board will not change the intent or message of comments. They will appear once approved.
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.